(still of Bateman and Kidman in The Family Fang)
The siblings, played by Jason
Bateman (Arrested Development, Horrible Bosses) and Nicole Kidman (Rabbit Hole,
Paddington) have been referred to Child A and Child B their entire lives. As
kids, they have been forced by Caleb and Camille to stage robberies, use fake
blood, perform a song called “Kill All Parents” in public and even kiss each
other as Romeo and Juliette in a school play sending their teacher to early
retirement. We get to see all of the said performance pieces (and more) in
well-placed flashbacks.
As adults, Buster has a writer’s
blockage and Annie is stuck in indie film making hell. They are criticised by Caleb
and Camille as lesser artists now than they were as part of the Fang assembly (“Crap movies and a tampon
commercial!” is all Caleb has to say of his daughter’s career) and still get occasionally
drawn into their oddball art.
Things get further complicated when
the parents, played in the present day by the great Christopher Walken (Seven
Psychopaths, Hairspray) and Tony Award winning actress Maryann Plunkett, decide
to pull one of their most elaborate and ludicrous performance pieces yet. If this
part sounds too good to be true, it’s only because it is.
The Fangs are a celebrity family
much like we might have had if Marina Abramovic and her ex-partner Ulay had
ever decided to have children and use them as props. The script by Pulitzer Prize
winning screenwriter David Lindsay-Abaire (Rabbit Hole, Shrek the Musical) is, like the novel, at
its best when it focuses on the crazy shenanigans of the senior Fangs. Performance art is still
relatively new, not really a part of pop culture just yet, and The Family Fang
takes a particular delight in being a bit of a cinematic pioneer in that
regard. It’s also extremely hard to imagine anyone else playing these roles as
good as Walken and Plunkett do.
But as we get to the newest Fang
performance, the film begins to drag. The big art piece (or is it?) of Caleb and Camille takes them
both out of the film for long stretches of time leaving Buster and Annie to
provide us with all the entertainment. Bateman does a good job with his more
fragile character and along with this year’s The Gift he has proved himself to
be quite the force of nature, but his writer’s blockage is simply boring. The
circumstances of Kidman’s character’s life are perhaps more original but they
are vaguely presented and the actress has a hard time selling the character who is
clearly supposed to be much younger than she is.
So, we are left with the siblings
sitting in dark rooms, moping around the house, doing research and arguing
about what is the best course of action. It begins to feel like something more
appropriate for cable TV, which probably explains why the film has been picked
up for distribution by no one other than STARZ premium cable. It also doesn’t
help that Bateman, who serves here as a director following his 2013 debut Bad
Words, has yet to acquire a particular style and, together with his cinematographer
Ken Seng, makes the story look far gloomier and drearier on screen than it really needed to
be.
This family deserved better.
6.5/10
No comments:
Post a Comment